It
was a brilliant attempt at bridging an increasingly polarized conflict. The two
sides had become irreconcilable to each other, and it had actually gotten kind
of nasty. They both found each other repulsive, and the dislike between the two
groups had become so strong and intense that members of either side wouldn’t
dare be caught with the others. In fact, as time wore on, even though the plan
was to bring people closer together, the two groups were actually moving
farther and farther apart. There had been debates, and, my, how the sparks had
flown! Those who had watched them had harbored some hope that they would clear
up some of the issues, but the disputes had actually muddied the waters even
more. Things were reaching a boiling point, and so the person at the center of
the controversy, the one person who had been able to listen and engage both
sides reached for one of the most trusted tricks in his bag. He told a story.
He
told them a story—a story that he hoped would illustrate that they both had a
place at the table, that in the new regime no one was going to be left out
intentionally. It was a story which would use everyday images and occurrences but
then he would twist them just a bit, then add a mixture of exaggeration in
order to get them interested in how it might all play out. It was a story
which, of course, he hoped they might recognize themselves in—both the members
of the legalistic rule-following crowd and the ones who didn’t seem to care
about rules.
"The Return of the Prodigal Son" (Batoni, 1773) |
In
the story there was a father with two sons and right at the start everyone knew
what that meant: boys do what father says. The older one would one day be fully
independent and receive the majority of the estate—once the father died, of
course—and the younger son would receive whatever was leftover. But right at
the start of the story something goes horribly, offensively wrong. The younger
son, seemingly out of nowhere, walks up to his father and unceremoniously demands
his portion of the property right that moment. This is kind of unheard of, and
that group of rule-followers listening to the story probably would have thrown
up a little bit in their mouths at that point. No one has the audacity to do
that, except the most vulgar of people. No one makes a request for their
inheritance while their parent is still living. It’s basically like saying, “I
wish you were dead.”
Remember
that one of the original ideas behind telling the story about these two sons was
to get them to recognize themselves, the Pharisees and scribes, especially, since
they were acting kind of like the older brother. But the main idea, the
storyteller hopes, is to get them to recognize the father. He’s the one who
brings it all together. He’s a father of profound grace and understanding, a
parent who is more excited to celebrate the restoration of someone’s life than
in handing out punishments. He’s a father of seemingly unlimited compassion, who
waits patiently and pleads insistently. He’s a father who illustrates that the
kingdom of God is always running out onto the road to forgive and renew, who
wants both sides—all sides—to join in the joy of bringing everyone home. That’s
the nature of this father’s love, which is something the older son is too self-focused
for the time-being to understand: It is inherently a love that looks outward,
waiting, anticipating a chance to show mercy. That’s who the man telling them
the story wants them to recognize, because that love can actually pull these
two groups together.
Most
other fathers most likely wouldn’t have handed his son the money, but for
whatever crazy reason this father does. He takes the younger son right to the
bank, gets the attorney and the will, does some basic calculations, and liquidates
the assets. He divides out who gets what and the younger son then promptly takes
his share of the cash and gets as far from his dad as he possibly can. Think
Vegas. Or the Cayman Islands. Wherever you would go to escape it all and put
your past behind you…that’s where this guy heads. And there is no intention of
staying in touch. He goes off the grid completely. He wants absolutely nothing
to do with that place he came from.
But
the way in which he lives ultimately is a dead end for him. He never sees the
famine coming, but even if that hadn’t happened, he would have had plenty of
problems sooner or later. He winds up working for some guy who pays him just to
slop pigs, a dirty job that no self-respecting Jewish person would lower
himself to, even if he weren’t that religious. And a strange things starts to
happen to him while he’s hungry and covered in mud. Maybe it was a childhood
memory. Maybe it was the thought of his mother fixing his old favorite food. Something
starts him thinking about all that he left behind him. He’s an awful long way away
now, but might there be a way to get back? He knows his father, if he’s like
any normal father out there, would never welcome him back as an equal, but
maybe he’d be able to get a job there and he’d at least not have to worry about
starving to death.
So
he comes to himself. Literally. It’s like part of him had been wandering
elsewhere while a small part of him had secretly stayed behind, and at this
point, the two parts meet up again. The
wandering him comes back to the long-lost version of himself and he realizes
everything more clearly. He practices a little speech that might win his father
back over, and he starts off back towards home.
So
far much of this story has been very over-the-top—the disrespect shown by the
younger son, the profligacy of the father, the job slopping pigs out in
Timbuktu. But the most over-the-top part of the story what comes next. The
father sees his son on the road back and runs out to meet him. At this point
you realize that this father must have been waiting the whole time, because
otherwise it would have been really uncanny that he just happened to spot his
son in the distance coming back. The father runs out to his son on the road and
is so excited he tries to chest bump his son. He starts high-fiving him, basically
smothering him with love because he’s so happy to see him. And the younger son,
probably a little taken aback, starts to go through his well-rehearsed speech about
being sorry and everything, but before he can really get to the end of it the
father has already started texting the kitchen to throw on some barbecue. He’s
ordering a tent so friends can come over and they can party all night. And he’s
got the D.J. lined up. Just to drive it all home, they’re going to start the
party off with that song by American Idol
winner Phillip Phillips from a few years back, the one that goes,
Settle down, it’ll all be clear.
Don’t pay no mind to the demons, they fill you with fear.
The trouble it might drag you down
If you get lost, you can always be found
Just know you’re not alone.
‘Cause I’m going to make this place your home.
Don’t pay no mind to the demons, they fill you with fear.
The trouble it might drag you down
If you get lost, you can always be found
Just know you’re not alone.
‘Cause I’m going to make this place your home.
That’s
what’s playing in the background as they head back to the ranch.
Which
is what the other son must have heard. All the focus so far has naturally been
on that younger, wandering son, but all this while the older, dutiful son has
been helping out dad and not interfering with anyone’s life. And yet, he is
just as distant as the young son. He hears the party and can’t even bring
himself to join in. Not only that, but instead of asking his father what’s
going on he goes to one of the slaves to find out. He is so angry and confused
about what his father is doing that he doesn’t even want to be a part of it. He’s
out there Tweeting, though, all kinds of nasty things about his family. #unfair
#cantbelieveit #wheresmyparty.
And
then, for the second time in the story, the father comes out of the house to
greet a son. For the second time in the story, the father deals lovingly and
patiently with profound disrespect from one of his sons.
"The Prodigal Son" (Auguste Rodin) |
The
story ends, though, without any resolution, which is another quirky feature of
the way this guy tells stories. We never know if the older son actually makes
his way into the party and is reconciled with his brother and his father. We
don’t know if the younger son, perhaps, wanders away and gets lost again. It’s
kind of open-ended, any conclusion playing itself out over and over again in
the lives of the listeners who get lost and then found, then lost and found
again…or who get self-possessed and resentful and then found again.
Eventually
the time for storytelling, however, runs out, and the man who tries desperately
to bring all of God’s children under one loving kingdom of profound forgiveness
ends up dying to do so. He lays his life down on the cross in order to show
what so many of his stories and sermons tried to: that it’s impossible to get
too far from his Father’s love. It just can’t be done. No amount of turning
your back on his life, no amount of ignoring the grace, no amount of internal
resentment and selfishness no amount of dying can separate you from this God.
The
focus of Lent is repentance, learning to receive again and again God’s grace in
Christ. Two weeks ago repentance looked like coming to terms with our
vulnerability as humans and realizing God is our refuge. Last week it meant understanding
our lifelong responsibility for growth in faith and God’s desire to give us new
chances to attempt that. This week it’s about coming to ourselves, turning
around, and running back into the open arms of a God whose instinct is to come
out onto the road of life to meet us.
The
troubles, they might drag you down
You get lost, but you can always get found.
Just know you’re not alone…
This God will always be your home.
You get lost, but you can always get found.
Just know you’re not alone…
This God will always be your home.
A-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-ah-men
No comments:
Post a Comment